Monday, December 17, 2007

Angels

Angel:

A servitor of the God and Goddess, created by them after the great struggle, when the source split into two half creating the unity of duality. The first servitors, or agrogors where called the ELI.

We learn from books and lectures like, The secret History of Heaven by David Monteith that The ELI where created because the source craved understanding, enlightenment about its nature. This is where the misunderstanding of what was first the Darkness or the light. There was neither, as all was with the source, all light, darkness, matter and energies where with the source. Not till the great struggle did the source split into two, all Else was created after using the Unity of Duality, the new creation of the division of the source. Examples are scattered every where, light and shadow. day and night, male and female, yin and yang, front and back. The first divine unity -duelity.

The Angels are servitors of that division the God and Goddess. An agrogor or though form if you will, thought up by the God and Goddess, designed to server them- or herm-which I will explain later. The Angels where made by them for them, their will. So they server. Thus servitor. They are what is known as fleshless beings created to never be in the flesh. We are Flesh beings, created by the God and Goddess, why, like the angels we are creations of them for them, their will. We are thus Flesh servitors, the God and Goddess's agrogors if you will. This makes us angels of the flesh, as God is in me or not at all.

The Christian bible points to thus truth by telling us the story of the so called first man and woman being tested over the issue of subjection to authority. This is to say man has chosen free will, his will, over that of Gods will, the God and Goddess will. In the Christian text it writes:

Ephesians 2:2
"The Course of independence is made to appear enticingly superior to that of subjection"

That is to say that man has chosen his independence over that of subjection to herms will.

The Supreme master Hing Hai writes in her book -
The key of immediate enlightenment:

http://www.godsimmediatecontact.com/pdf/freebook-en.pdf

Note The masters new terminology for God so that they represent both sexes are as Follows:

SHE+HE becomes HES=hes(like in mess)
HER+HIM becomes HIRM=hirm(like in firm)
HERS+HIS becomes HIERS=hiers(like in beers)
Example: When God wants, Hes makes things happen according to Hiers will to suit hirm.

"A fully divine person is a fully human being. A fully human being is fully divine. Right now we are only half a human being. We do things with hesitation, we separate sin and virtue, we make a big deal out of everything, and accordingly judge ourselves and other people. We suffer from our own limitations about what God should do. Understand?
Actually God is inside us and we limit hirm"

Saturday, October 20, 2007

First Painting Sold

I have sold my first Painting today!

Setting Sun
50$






Sold for 50$

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Do you know what Love is?

Do you know what Love is?
I'm not sure now if I do.

Warning:
You may not after reading this either.

I have recently been to a sociology seminar,
And this is what I was told.

Love is not a True emotion.
"Love" is the effect, or bi-product of true emotions.

Considering hypotheticly this statment was true..which I did, using belief shifting..and came up with this little gingle.."Love is the snow on top of the mountain. The True emotions are the base with which Love stands on."

Sounds good right?



Part of my brain says "yes this statement is true because Human LOVE is not a universal LOVE. Human love is selfish love." There is no emotion which does not leave some kind of mark on the mind, and all marks are bad marks. The other part of me says what about Divine love. This surly must be a true emotion, or is divine love again the product of the universes true emotions?

Crowley gives this example is his book 4 Aleister crowley;
"Hope and fear are only opposite phases of a single emotion; both are incompatible with the purity of the soul. With the passions of man the case is somewhat different, not to be suppressed, but emotion is impressed from without. It is an invasion of the circle."

So with that said LOVE and HATE like hope and fear must also be attached at some point like the opposite phases of a single emotion example that crowley gives. But what about Pure love, is this 'universal love' that people speak of in Christianity, and Judaism, Muslims and Wiccans, some how attached to hate? OR Is this only the selfish human love that is attached to hate?

I thought that pure true universal Love can mend all heal the most wicked and drive them to good, with a simple touch of whom evers hand the universe has chosen to work through. There is something that does this and it is universal. Again crowley enlightens us a bit on this.
He wrights:
"There is, however a universal solvent and harmonizer, a certain dew which is so pure that a single drop of it cast into the water of the cup will for the time being bring all to perfection. This dew is called Love. Even as in the case of human love, the whole universe appears perfect to the man who is under its control, so is it, and much more, with the divine love of which it is now spoken."

"For human love is an excitement, not a stilling of the mind; and as it is bound to the individual, only leads to greater trouble in the end. The divine love on the contrary, is attached to no symbol."


MY LAST THOUGHTS:

If Universal LOVE is a true emotion, that is to say not attached to hate and an emotion unto itself. Then my personal love becomes invalid does it not? As I as a simple human can not provide "True Love". If Universal love is not a true emotion, then it is attached to hate, and there for not Universal nor true....


Did this just make Love that much more confusing or what!!??



I believe that there are two kinds of Love,
Universal Love and Individual love.

Neither out wieghts the other, both have pros and cons in my view; as Universal love is bound to the laws of "mutual benificial"; and expressed in its complete by no one person, but in the
"The unity Of duelity"

Individual love is expressed from the individual to the individual.
"The Solidity of individuality"